Bloodline Inheritance Trusts

Lineancy inheritance rules from one Great Great Grandparent within the same blood-line. including males and females of the dna line:  

Assumably the %'s of ownership, declare yearly dividend potential.

*the main problem w/the trust shown below, 
is the one night stand impregnancy females,  
not of the line who attempt to declare major ownership privileges
due to a birth of a child to the bloodline. 
There needs to be a time capacity energy involvement % factor also, 
however I haven't included it. 

The 'trust' is only from 1 gg grandparent, 
the spouses, and spouses of aunts and uncles' spouses are not included.
When I have more time I will attempt a better drawing of the fountain
of inherital politics and wealth.  
(on a personal note, the fountain surname is actually a reverse usage, 
and jennings is the g grandparent., fountain a gg grandparent.) 

The good news is the actual tally of dividend potential is from a total of 16 gg-grandparents, if your in my age group,
However this spreadsheet image below is only representing 1.....

1.) The George Calvin Williams trust info is listed at the bottom of this page.
(precipatator of this idea.) 
-------
Sadly I ran a command at my prompt and removed my home dir and the fall event of 3 partitions is incurring so I cannot update right now, as this is overwhelmingly becoming my saga of maliciousnous from a person on the internet who listed the command. Yes, I am not an expert, but I have no option here but to use linux and teach myself as I go, when persons destroy others files we are in a serious dilema all across the world. The persons being attacked are only learning persons, please do not ever type "$Home" near the "rm  -rf" command. 
I was only attempting to rm a wine config. that was not deleting., and now have lost myself into a void, a void of realization that my life is nothing, 
but a sad grouping of possible touch-backs with digital photos or spreadsheets.  
-------

 

The non-image version is unsteady to view, out from the spreadsheet

 but available to use as a cut and paste, back into a spreadsheet: 

image. 1 of 3	Family Trust		Non-sellable only Inheritable.
gifted ownership rules to the descendant children, of the heir line:
If the original funds were from the gg grandfathers bloodline:
	included:	spouse of the married-into bloodline, shares with the bloodline husband or wife until death, the remaining one keeps the entire shared % quantity, as the widow(er). , then children of the bloodline are recipients.
		If there are no children, then shares go equally to the brothers and sisters (and their children if deceased) of the bloodline.
		If there are no children and no brothers and sisters, shares go equally to the first cousins (if alive) of the bloodline, if the cousins have passed away the children of those first cousins -with the bloodline- are recipients.
If the original funds were from the gg grandmothers bloodline:
	included:	spouse of the married-into bloodline, shares with the bloodline husband or wife until death, the remaining one keeps the entire shared % quantity, as the widow(er). , then children of the bloodline are recipients.
		If there are no children, then shares go equally to the brothers and sisters (and their children if deceased) of the bloodline.
		If there are no children and no brothers and sisters, shares go equally to the first cousins (if alive) of the bloodline, if the cousins have passed away the children of those first cousins -with the bloodline- are recipients.
	included:	past polygamous marriages within the bloodline, regardless the amount of children.
	included:	the present, 2010 on, the first 4 children of the parent within the bloodline.
not included:		the 5th or more children within the bloodline.
not included:		non bloodline descendants, orphans or adoptees, as that is a personal immediate family decision.
	illegitimates are included, if the dna is a match.
	Though the legitimates, are the first recipients. ie.,
	if 2 legitimates and 3 illegitimates exist, the first 2 legitimates, then the first 2 illegitimates are recipients.
	During any proving time, only the legitimates and/or proved illegitimates receive shares.
image. 2 of 3
The recipients have access to the spendant available funds, and cannot be single or group-tallied out. whether in prison, institutionalised, physical sickness, family dis-ownments or other family embarrassment.
The family cannot vote persons out that are :
in a cult, over-religious, or not religious,
involved with or in porno or illegal drugs,
dishumorous, anti-social, rude and/or generally unaccepted by others.
uneducated via university or colleges,
involved in the military, or convicted of an act of treason.
Living outside the bounds of the main families particular government affiliation.
The family cannot vote persons out that are incurring:
normal judicial laws of societal inclusion or disclusion, it does effect heirship rights.
The family or persons thereof cannot request extradition of the heir from foreign lands.
disrespecting does not disinherit, as persons living as respectant, have not bountied in the past.
image. 2 of 3	Ownership amount:				the rules are listed on image 1 and 2.
	The children numbers do not declare spouses, only heirs.
*Follow only 1 column because there is only 1 g grandparent to descend from:							aprox. birth dates: to:
great great grandparent	4/4			recipient total:			1830	1860
If the ggrandparent had more than more than 4 children expand the starting columns:	100%				(children)
	1
	The gg grandparent has children (they become 4 brothers and sisters):
great grandparent (1)	1/4	1/4	1/4	1/4			1860	1890
% amount to each sibling:	25%	25%	25%	25%
(1)=you have 1 parent or (g)(gg) grandparent each, cousins,aunts,uncles,etc. are included in offspring #'s.	1	1	1	1	4
	hank + w.	ezra + h .	verla + h.	jowel + w.	(fictitious)
h. and w. are from other bloodlines: not heirs.	standard # of children per generation from the gg grandparents children:
	1	2	3	4
grandparent (1)	1/4	1/8	1/12	1/16			1890	1920
% amount to each:	25%	12.50%	8.33%	6.25%
g grandparents group # of children:	1	2	3	4	10
parents group	1/4	1/16	1/36	1/64			1920	1950
% amount to each:	25%	6.25%	2.78%	1.56%
grandparents group # of children:	1	4	9	16	30
my age group	1/4	1/32	1/108	1/256			1950	1980
% amount to each:	25.00%	3.12%	0.93%	0.39%
# my age group:	1	8	27	64	100
children	1/4	1/64	1/324	1/1024			1980	2010
% amount to each:	25.00%	1.56%	0.31%	0.10%
# of children:	1	16	81	256	354
If verla was your ggrandmother w/25%, you, your siblings and cousins (27) each receive .93%, of the original 100 %.
Calculations are the full % amount of the great grandparents share divided by the # of living descendants.
When the bloodline parent and conceptive parent passes away, in the example: the 'my age group' shown above reduces from 8 to 7, then the 3.12% they shared before, is equally divided between thier 2 children.
%'s of In-the-Life share to earnings pay-outs, yearly: The main recipient "oldest generation person" is encouraged to distribute a portion of the allocated proceeds... equally to the younger persons in the bloodline. In amounts of 5-25% each depending on the number of descendants. As the point of the life trust, is not to be subvertive or stingy with the younger generations, as it can create a victimization and rejection cycle that lowers self esteem and declares a non-able to help anyone or anything personality type of person, in a world that requires assistance. Group voting: On more expensive item purchases (such as a house)... from the yearly earned proceeds, a group vote of more than 51 % of the family is required. Charitable givings to non family members: These are limited to 33% per year, for the oldest generational recipient. Family Trust: Once a person dies those shares go on into the next generation. There is no probate as the amount is a share quantity only, a share amount that is never sold, only inheritable.
In dissolved marriages: The birthmother of the heirs that is not of the bloodline, is not to be kept at the mercy of her childrens charity, she receives 5% of share rights until her death. The non-bloodline father (of heir) receives 5% of share rights until his death.

George Calvin Williams trust info: b.1936 (He also had 1 son with his fathers name.) 

My family trust from my gg grandfather begins with 13 children,
from 2 wives, (and not 4 as shown in the example),

as some have died early, such as silas.
I am slowly gettng a database only of those descendants, 

to help figure out the allocation share % number.

(oddly this type of trust formation, needs to be done for everyone, 

as it's a better way of keeping the world persons tamer 

and invokes less criminal activity).

---------

The initial 100% is divided between his children, 

and their % 's of ownership,
 divided equally to their children and so on.
----------
If one of his children and all of their subsequent children from the bloodline die out,
then, their inheritance share, returns back into the family trust,
that of George Calvin Williams (born 1936) with his father being George Washington Williams.
(Williams Island is listed in his fathers name as a trust also as a wildlife refuge).

This trust design will proceed in a similar manner, and it is not sellable at any time,
only inheritable by others within the family trust.
If the Williams farm is also included,
that is an upper trust (above 6 generations) involving all

 of George Washingtons Williams children.
I am only working on the lower trust (6 generations) and the
200-2000 square miles of Sierra Madres he jointly purchased.

If any persons in this lineage have given large donations in life
and upon death proceedings to the mormon church (LDS),
there will be an inquiry, and a demand return of payment back to our family.
We have been taken advantage of, years of fighting for our land,
and giving tithing in the midst of poverty, due to the mexican rebellion.
If land deeds are stored as paid into the mormon church as quit claims etc,
those excessive donations must be returned to the family
(not to one person, named as a williams, 

only to our family heritage trust from George Calvin Williams (b.1936) of tennessee. ).

I am not thrilled with religious theft of personal family wealth inheritances, 

surely the church of latter day saints does not want to embroil itself into 

the derogatories of such a past practice, and will concede any ownership claims

and return those properties and endurances back to our family.

 

  

Consciousness and nerves

many various single cells

Dealing with consciousness using nerves being the fail or pass system.

A single cell organism it has one objective survival goal,
one direction with one spirit of energy flow in that energy flow.

It has succeeded to this point from many pass or fail evolutions.

single cell, in marianas trench.

When the single cell organism dedicates into a larger grouped organism,
it still keeps its individual directives.

he is called simple, yet a multiple-celled organism.

Multicellular includes protists, fungi and plants and animals including:
red algae and kelp, mosses, water lilies and ferns, conifers, jellyfish, 
corals and sponges, earthworms, octopuses, snails and slugs, insects, 
crustaceans, mammals, birds, reptiles, dinosaurs
fish and amphibians:

In the grouped organism the many single cell organisms continue as normal,
 yet endure further evolutions.

Those evolutions occur because the single cell is still undergoing a pass/fail scenario
yet with the circumstances of many others.

So a bump "action", that never would have occurred before on its own, is happening.
When that is overdone it must change its action or die.
The action being another direction or finding a quieted grouping area with less disturbances.

If enough of the single cells that are going along as normal experience a blockage,
it persists as a nerve fault,
where before it was a usual unnerved flow of reactive states.

The blockage event disturbs them and they are limited into basic survive now or die sequencing.

Similar to a squirmish event.
If they all had the plan to go north and are blocked
they are forced to retract,
and either try to evolve quickly elsewhere,
or die waiting for the original regrouping to proceed.

As food and nutrients are now not available, as normal,
they must find them another way or perish.

In the moment of the nerve blockage,
they are experiencing an unusual frequency to before,
so its like an out-of-tune instrument all of a sudden.
where before they did have an original tune that worked.

Like matter itself with object-to-object,
putting 2 pens together further or closer apart is a different freq.
When they clash together it is the most objectionable registration of the objects.

So the single cells may be running and editing
to maintain a less than objectionable frequency,
as something was wrong all of a sudden.
Such as a wall on a freeway.  
If being away from their normal in-tune frequency is disturbing to them,
it is an aspect of pain consequence and felt.

Oddly now the nerves have 2 direct localities of incoming feelings available to the brain.
1.) external: from the out of frequencied aspect, registered in the aura also.
where before that area was humming as a deep green, it is now a pink hue.
2.) internal: the block of grouped single cell organisms not able to flow as normal,
that registering to the brain as a message area not received.
When a message area is not received, panic occurs...
if the time in the delayed moment(s) go on too long.
After no message is sent, the brain sends freqs higher in the why question.
sending out an answer this...and return query... to the area,
as it is an abnormal problem.

acting as the question of...
why do i not any longer feel correct in this part of my body?

When persons still have latent feelings to forever non-available areas,
perhaps that is fed by a major grouping of memory cells
that take much longer to forget the information.

The pain message to the brain would be sent as a higher internal freq.
upping the bloods frequency outputs also, depending on the damage.

Just for info....
1.) with aura occurrence recognition,
this lends further credibility to:
a.  hands-on-healers
b. "acupressure"
c. and also that fun:   your now healed...phaser on star trek.

The Powders of Immature

From:
tractorization: over-refining what was there and creating the immature soils...

Refined, crumbled, machined, sived, powdered and over-stirred...
the soil is no longer ~ the old soil normal.

Before: Simple allotment with "Rejuvenating Flowers"

The olde soil consisting of larger minerals-to-plant combinations.
Where a chunk of calcium stone, was gathered from the plant in only one area.

Now, with our current system of agriculture, the stone is broken and chipped into many pieces, as a smaller sand.
The plant has had to alter and receive its diet from the once larger piece of calcium, ie. to little bits of the calcium stone, located in several different areas.

After: Large Swatch of Tilled Agriculture

It*(the soil component) gives an instant food supply to the plant, yet,
the plant is fed in that shorter moment from the tiny sand pieces.
--Where before it received a meal in one restaurant,
---instead of the new rational portions of many restaurants.

and the minerals and soil parts are now all tinier,
...calcium, magnesium, iron, insect meal, sea and river shells, worm castings, etc.
--------------

Where in the past persons had time to write, or study,
now the people cannot as they have deficit syndromes.

The parallel here to the deficits-- are the instant rations, of food supply,
gathered in a shorter time frame, (and click), moving on to another instant ration.

Easily distracted humans

Creating an immature population of quickly distracted persons.

To look at and review are the simple garden allotments, that dot much of Eastern European gardens. However, even those after years of incorrect fertilization and nutritive balance can have reduced nutritive supply.

Soil Testing

A call to soil testing for any new garden is not a bad idea.
Once supplied with the results, the necessary amendments and adjustments will be more exacting toward better nutritional values.